MindOS Prompt 示例载荷
这页直接展示后面 Prompt 三层最适合先对齐的 JSON 结构。你后面继续发提示词技术说明文档时，我们就优先按这些示例载荷去核对输入和输出。
MindOS Prompt 示例载荷
这些示例只演示 Prompt 真正该吃到的结构化字段，不演示逐题权重、原始 score 或 B / D 模块内部规则全文。
1. 评分 / 汇总前置层
先把答题结果整理成服务端稳定结构，再交给后续 Prompt 读取。
{
"assessment_version": "L3",
"normalized_answers": [
{
"question_id": "L3_A_001",
"option": "B"
},
{
"question_id": "L3_B_012",
"option": "A"
}
],
"dimension_scores_10": {
"heart": 71,
"cognition_mode": 63,
"emotional_quotient": 68,
"values": 74,
"personality": 61,
"motivation": 66,
"orientation_force": 72,
"awareness_force": 65,
"connection_force": 58,
"action_force": 69
},
"resistance_scores_r1_r5": {
"r1": 58,
"r2": 47,
"r3": 61,
"r4": 49,
"r5": 42
},
"function_group_scores_s1_s5": {
"s1": 70,
"s2": 62,
"s3": 59,
"s4": 64,
"s5": 73
},
"four_forces_f1_f4": {
"f1": 69,
"f2": 66,
"f3": 57,
"f4": 68
},
"rank_base": "D5",
"quadrant_base": "高心智+高能量"
}2. 解释层 Prompt
把位阶、画像、摩擦、风险等解释真正需要的修正层结果喂给 Prompt。
{
"assessment_version": "L3",
"rank_base": "D5",
"quadrant_base": "高心智+高能量",
"rank_shift_summary": "B 模块显示风险防御偏强，表现位阶下修半级。",
"profile_shift_summary": "画像从『推进型』修正为『谨慎推进型』。",
"friction_summary": {
"inner": "对犯错代价较敏感",
"relation": "对协作中失控感有预警",
"structure": "遇到模糊边界时容易先收缩"
},
"risk_summary": [
"高标准导致犹豫",
"对不确定性的容忍度偏低"
],
"mask_break_summary": "D 模块显示公开表达比真实内在状态更保守。",
"b_module_revision_summary": "风险防御和路径依赖阻抗偏高，需要在建议层做修正。",
"d_module_consistency_summary": "自述与作答一致性中等，存在轻微防御性表达。"
}3. 报告生成 Prompt
把已经稳定的解释块和报告章节顺序交给报告层 Prompt 生成文案。
{
"assessment_version": "L3",
"user_context": {
"age": 34,
"role": "销售负责人",
"industry": "企业服务"
},
"report_sections": [
"用户概览",
"四象限定位",
"摩擦分析",
"十二画像分析",
"产品与微干预建议"
],
"rank_interpretation": "当前位阶属于稳定推进阶段，但在高风险情境下会明显转保守。",
"profile_interpretation": "画像更偏谨慎推进型，适合先确定边界再行动。",
"friction_interpretation": "最大摩擦来自对犯错成本的预期过高。",
"product_recommendation_basis": [
"位阶 D5",
"高心智+高能量",
"风险防御阻抗偏高"
],
"micro_intervention_basis": [
"降低单次决策压力",
"先做低风险试探动作",
"强化协作场景下的边界表达"
],
"cta_blocks": {
"primary": "先去销帮做一条真实机会判断",
"secondary": "回工作台看完整档案",
"support": "如果仍不确定，再看产品建议和微干预"
}
}